Resource revenue sharing : Property rights and economic incentives

The better For these reasons, it is recommended that Canada continue view is that the provinces own the natural resources, and with specific modes of sharing natural resource revenue the federal Crown owns natural resources in the territories, that generate positive incentives for the production of subject to the terms of modern land-claims agreements. [...] Nonetheless, the demand for resource “Resource revenue sharing options and issues need to be revenue sharing has now moved to the national stage, explored nationally with the involvement of First Nations, with the replacement of Shawn Atleo by Perry Bellegarde appropriate levels of government, and technical experts.”7 as national chief of the Assembly of First Nations (AFN). [...] Companies might web of agreements among the Cree of northern Quebec, do this in any case in order to create a local workforce the government of Quebec and resource companies and supply network, but they have also been led in this developing mines and hydro power in the region, “This direction by the Supreme Court’s Haida Nation and development model, in which the economic incentives of Mikisew Cre [...] At the time – from the 1870s to the is the relevant language from Treaty 6 (all the Numbered first decade of the 20th century – there was no serious Treaties are similar in this regard): contemplation of mining activity, they argue, and therefore the sub-surface rights were not included in the treaties.33 The Plain and Wood Cree Tribes of Indians, and all other the Indians inhabiting the district [...] In the delicate and the Prairie Provinces would constitute the traditional business of oral history, the sympathies of investigators territory of some First Nation or other, and since land was can be easily transmitted to their respondents.38 only ceded to “the depth of a plow,” the First Nations still own all natural resources everywhere.